Comments on: Celebrity Moron Of The Week: Bourne Loser Matt Damon

By: Joe Horn

Joe Horn — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:19:07 +0000

Once again, the Hollywood elite (aka the new communist party) show their complete and utter stupidity about the world around them. Both Matt Damon and Brad Garrett showed a complete lack of intelligence when asked about Sarah Palin and the only thing either could do is insult the woman and call her “white trash” and “hockey mom”. These two incredibly stuck up and moronic individuals would actually put an unqualified black man into the most powerful position in the world just to prove some ridiculous elitest point. Matt Damon (and others) love to toss their vile garbage on Governor Palin and talk about inexperience but somehow aren’t bothered by the fact that Mr. Obama has served a measely 3 years in the senate and spent 2 of those 3 campaigning for president. This man’s only qualification to be president is literally the fact that he has run to be president! And I find that horrifying. I wonder why Matt Damon, Brad Garrett, and the other idiots don’t see it that way? A lack of brain power tends to group people together in cultish thinking, regardless of how stupid it may be and I think thei explains the Hollywood crowd very well.

By: Rackmonster

Rackmonster — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 01:05:55 +0000

Wow, the FIRST thing out of his mouth is how he himself says “I don’t know anything about her” yet he goes off on her record like he knows something.
No dumbass, she only turned the state of Alaska around, cleaned up the political system, sent out a check to every tax paying Alaskan. Has an approval rating of 83%. I find it such a joke that Hollywood people think they know what a true everyday American is thinking and feeling. They have no idea when all they do is play make believe for a living, work about 6 months every two years on a movie then live off the interest of your overpaid salaries.
I do agree with him on one point, he does know what it would be like to be in a bad movie. Not necessarily a bad Disney movie, but definately, he does have first hand knowledge of being in bad movies. I’ll give him that first hand experience.

Hollywood needs to STFU and just do the only thing they know how to do, entertain us. Even that is a stretch in Matt Damon movies.

WHO do you think founded this country in the beginning. People , everyday people with no political agendas. Just the desire to do public service and create something good.
OBAMA is the one with a fraction of the experience of Sarah Palin. Although a fraction of a fraction of a percent experience, it is experience I guess.

Uhg, Hollywood. like they know what everyday American’s thinks……..

By: Joe Vasquez

Joe Vasquez — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:07:17 +0000

Do we really care what Matt Damon, Lindsey Lohan or Pam Anderson think about politics? Is it because they have made movies playing characters that aren’t real; does that give them credibility to speak on issues of politics? Why are we giving these windbags any air time at all. Shut up and act you bunch of doofs! Hollywood mentality is about as idiotic as the democratic party…oops, was I a little redundant there?

By: Garpin

Garpin — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 18:34:51 +0000

Matt,

For someone as well educated as yourself, you must realize how impossibly stupid you look criticizing someone you yourself admitted you know next to nothing about.

As an example: I know nothing about the super-collider, but I have to say I don’t know if it can make coffee, but if it can, it will probably taste bad..

stick to movies, doofus.

By: Jack

Jack — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 06:04:02 +0000

Matt Damon is speaking the truth, yea you guys hate on him he is a great actor who you haters probably paid 10 buck to see.

By: NYMOM

NYMOM — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:11:59 +0000

Someone PLEASE explain to me why idiots like this with little education, little experience in the real world, marginal sanity (Let’s face it they spend their lives pretending to be someone else)are even asked this type of question. He doesn’t think she’s capable of being President. Well I don’t think he’s capable of making such a complex assessment. His intelligence is only make-up deep. Who does this? Who interviews idiots like this?

By: UFBret

UFBret — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:41:00 +0000

When I need to know the distinction between stage left and stage right, I will ask Matt Damon.

Until then, he is just another entertainer not unlike that of a dancing monkey on a street corner.

Dance monkey, dance.

By: Brad Garrett Gets Raunchy On Fox And Friends' After The Show Show | Stuck On Stupid

Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:50:39 +0000

[...] Brad Garrett was on the web based Fox & Friends “After The Show Show” and got raunchy. Steve Doocy did not appreciate his type of humor. Check out Garrett’s reasoning for supporting Obama. This man has no clue. His reasoning for the Obama support matches Matt Damon’s convoluted explanation. [...]

By: Mary F

Mary F — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 04:28:28 +0000

Dear Matt – The thing that’s really absurd is that while you criticize Palin over the possibility that she may one day have to assume the responsibilities of President, you actively support Obama, who has less experience than Palin, in his quest to be President. Obama is clearly not ready to be President. Check with Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden, they have said as much. Matt, I suggest that you stick to acting. You do a fairly good job at it. I don’t want to hear your uninformed political opinions. You are doing yourself a disservice.

By: jack

jack — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:32:28 +0000

ps —a few simple facts do always help—there is not a 1 in 3 chance mccain won’t live to the end of his first term–yes on average american men live to 74–but by the time an american man has lived to 70 he has avoided “a lot of the likely causes of death” ie under 30 men it accidents etc–so an american man that lives to 70 on average will have another 13 years–last time I checked mccain is 72 so that would mean he has lived to 70—PLUS if they really wanted the actuarial facts they could plug in mccain’s family history etc—the facts is not what they are interested in–they are interested in stereotyping a person –

ps rich–historically doesn’t mean it is still happening, so your assumption there is faulty–and of obviously anyone has a right to an opinion–but we should all agree that looking at the honest facts should be a premise of statements–it would be far better to say “sure mccain could live till 100 but I don’t agree with the old patriotic notions of america–I think a move towards socialism and a more european style of living would be preferable therefore I am voting obama